seagate barracuda 7200.10 320gb hard drive

However, once you realize that Xbench really is a very poor test for hard drives, as it does not reflect actual hard drive performance with video. If Xbench is the only test you run between the Maxline 250GB and the Seagate 7200.10 250GB then you will be convinced that the 7200.10 is slower as a result of the slower random write speeds that Xbench displays for the 7200.10. RAID-0 stripes using Barracuda ES and Maxtor MaxLine I disagree, poor random write performance persists,Įven in a RAID-0 setup. Of course, in a single drive speed test users never learn about these issues. Once you know their limitations, the Seagate 7200.10 is one of the fastest hard drives available for large block transfers like video editing. The Seagate 7200.10 hard drives are the fastest available 7200 RPM hard drives on a Mac Pro when configured externally or as an internal striped RAID. There is a conflict internally with the on-board Mac Pro SATA bus that impaacts the 7200.10 series write speeds with individual hard drives. In addition, if you use them externally with any of the PCIe SATA host adapters the speed limit disappears too. If you use two or more Seagate 7200.10 hard drives internally in a Mac Pro as a striped RAID the speed limit disappears. I know Seagate is working on this and they have sent Barefeats a set of 750GB hard drives that fixed this issue but it still had low random access speeds. I have the latest Gal2D_3AAE shipping firmware that Seagate sent me but it still has a write speed limit of 46MB/sec. The real problem with Seagate 7200.10 hard drives is that when they are used internally in a Macintosh they have a limit of 46MB/sec write speeds. it seems like seagate 7200.10ĭrive is slower than others like WD Caviar RE2 ?

Seagate barracuda 7200.10 320gb hard drive